By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan said:
DonFerrari said:
That is consequence of increasing government and taxes, a very effective way to take money from the poor and deliver to the elite that marry the politicians.

Its about redistribution of wealth.
Normally that works best if you have high taxes (on the rich), and much lower ones on the poor, this gives you a more balanced country (with overall less poor).

So no its not a consequence of increaseing government & taxes.
Its whats done with it.
In the USA you guys simply just dont prioritise helping the weak & poor, as much as other parts of the world does.

The american dream is just that..... a dream.
If your weak & poor, sick, in the USA you ll likely stay that way.
Other parts of the world, you ll atleast get help, and have a fighting chance to rise.

When you study economy you'll see how good of an outcome you have from high taxes on rich... I'll tell you the basic outcomes, higher prices (because they'll roll the increases to the product price), desinvestment (risk not worth), or moving money overseas (which already occurred several times in USA due to previous increase in costs).

Giving more power and money to government only increases the bad usage, appropriation and abuse of power.

If you want to think other way I won't use my time to show you how bad the outcomes of socialism have been so far.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."