By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes I know Cell gave devs problems, I don't know that it have to do with the topic.

Not doomed, that would depend on the game itself, but it's better to be the biggest release of the month than one among many. And 3rd parties don't do heavy on releases on Q1, so they could avoid any big competition. But since they didn't give a date, just a month, perhaps it will be in the begining of the month and have almost 3 weeks to shine.

Sony have moved release date in the past to avoid competition, so not sure why MS wouldn't.

I haven't said MS can't win or that they would forfeit, so I have no idea what Sega have to do with it. I said I don't see a reason to cheer for their victory or to project a win in next gen. Sure MS can end up selling more and people still doesn't like it, but they haven't yet.

Most people aren't you, you can see from Xbox sales itself, going from 35 to 90+ and back to 35M (possibly ending in 50M) this clearly shows that people gave MS a chance when they liked their offer.

The problem with your new leader is that you are saying you want it for the sake of it and possibly because you don't like Sony, not because they would be doing something that would really improve the landscape.

Because last gen that was Sony's big issue. This gen MS has a massive image issue.

We know what the game is, it's Crackdown. If it was a brand new never before done IP, then that would remain up in the air. Tbh there are more releases in the coming  months during Summer, Winter and sometimes certain spring times. We already know Anthem is going to be coming out around the same time, so that becomes another big release, if not a multiplat one.

Tbh it'll be Anthem that seeks to compete, as it'll be covering 3 systems, while the other two cover one each. 

Well so far it doesn't seem like either of them are moving, even after the fact that EA just revealed their hand. Delays could very well happen, it's more or less becoming a thing these days in the AAA space.

No I meant that Sega threw in the towel, despite trying so little with the Dreamcast, but MS hasn't shown signs of throwing in the towel (Despite some thinking that half their focus on PC is them "leaving", even though they clearly aren't trying hard enough in that space). 

Most people aren't me or you either. 

My new "leader"?. What I want is someone else to take the lead, rather than the one that always wins due to other's incompetence and mistakes. I don't like Sony or MS, so it's definitely not one over the other.  Despite owning a Switch, I'm not gaga for Nintendo either. I'm just there for AC, Zelda and Pokemon.

MS could do something that improves the landscape though, and there will be some folk out there that claim they aren't doing anything.

Having the CPU problem wasn't what caused PS3 to lose sales, and considering MS have solved most of the initial problems in couple of months it's very hard to say that was the cause for their low sales this gen or that they not having that will grant them a good next gen.

Knowing what the game is doesn't make having more time by itself on the market something that won't help sales.

Sega throwed the towel because they were already near bankrupt, if MS was the size and financial of Sega they would have left the gaming space during X360 RROD issue. If you think MS not tryinh hard enough in PC is a show they aren't going PC them what that tells about console space were they have put very little effort this gen?

Yes most people are neither of us, this means most will chose their console based on what it offers, and that is why Sony have won against MS all 3 gens they were one against other. The only place Xbox ever had a chance was USA+UK.

Yes the old excuse that all the 4 wins of Sony (3 as overall gen leader and one against MS, or you can call technical 3 way tie) is because all others are incompetents...

MS sure could... and those some folks would perhaps be just like you that think Sony basically did nothing except win because others sucked.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."