By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 09 June 2018
Edit Thread
Cerebralbore101 said:
DonFerrari said:

But shouldn't the cut be about games you want or not instead of hitting a minimum threshold? I would understand someone that doesn't know the game looking at sub 80 and deciding to wait, but since you know and is interested I got curious why the 1 or 2 point drop would make this a hold. Look for comments like the ones from CGI to see if the game is one that would get your attention.

Problem is I want all the games! Well, almost all of them. 80 is my cut-off point, but I'm still interested in games that get 74-79. Sometimes even games that get below that, I"ll want to play just because of the genre, or developer. 

I understand, I don't have the problem of wanting all, and certainly if I don't know much about the game I would avoid buying sub 80. I hope when you get it you enjoy.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."