DonFerrari said:
Anyone here said there isn't bias in favor of Sony or that the issues with PSVita or price of PS2 games doesn't exist? Nope. The fact that people in gematsu or siliconera support those practices means squatch when we are talking about people not only in VGC but in this very thread, perhaps even you, defending the proposition of price for Labo. You said we weren't complaining about PSVita, in a thread that isn't about Vita, and a problem that is know and exist for a platform that is about dead and 5 years old. All off-topic, mind you. You used that as a mean to try and disqualify people complaining about the overprice of Labo. Should everyone when complaining about one specific subject complain about everything all the time? That is a very absurd proposition. WiiU was only brought to show that you not complaining about it in this thread doesn't show any bias as you tried to infer on not complaining about PSVita in this thread. But then you decided to make a triple somersault and say that WiiU complains are irrelevant, but PSVita is relevant because you care about HH (and I even refrained from asking for you to prove you complained about battery life or price of Switch for example). Still waiting to see you questioning duduspace1 on his premisse of marketing cost equaling development cost, or Labo costing same as pokemon because they both were released on a Nintendo platform, or price equaling cost or Labo costing the same to develop as GoW, or his promise to provide well thought estimatives for Labo costs. |
So you admit you have bias and have unreasonable complain about Wii U, which is over 5,5 years old. Good, if you can bring Wii U, i can bring Vita too so no problem. For a handheld with power and design like Switch. the battery life and price is understandable, can't say the same about vita.
@duduspace 1, i'm also curious about the cost but something look cheap doesn't mean it is cheap and some look amazing doesn't equal expensive
