By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mcube said:
DonFerrari said:

the 2 40 reviews impacted it about 1 point. So nope the game isn't sitting on the 80's because of those silly reviews.

I haven't said everybody should give it 80, what I said is that when a game accomplishes it's mission and deliver it's content as expected by their target base a 40 is obnoxious.

If you want to review games on your personal enjoyment and give 3/10 for a good working game that is your problem. But you make it pretty clear you hate the genre.

Maybe they enjoyed Heavy Rain and just didnt like this one? We dont know the context there is a point to be made for your case troll reviews obviously exist but I think 2 4/10´s are justifiable if it was a 1 or a 2 I´d agree with you 100%. 

Have you seem the justification for their 4s? Have you seem one of them giving a 90 for a very bare game?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."