| o_O.Q said: "but there are many cases where it's not important what's between you legs or how your parents raised you." but wouldn't that invalidate the whole proposal? if this subsection which is about the common experiences of men and women is primary then why is there a need for a switch between either group? surely the issue at hand is those experiences which are not common across the groups? |
"Also normally one can not know how many X and Y chromosomes an unknown person has, one can only assume on the basis of their appearance, so transgender women are strongly affected by the social norms for women."
that is from my first post, I meant the everyday life situations where transgender women and biological women behave the same. .
| o_O.Q said: my response to you was not about feminism btw, it was about the dismissal of biology under some conditions and its use under other conditions to erase the identity of trans people... my point is that you cannot logically do both |
why?
I think we should treat transgender people how they want to be treated but there are situations where we have to make a exception.
I think I explained pretty well where and why I would make those exceptions.
How do you think we should treat transgender people?
