By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Immersiveunreality said:
nanarchy said:
There are already very good "INDEPENDENT" groups that do this, i.e. ones that don't have the bias that Musk brings. In Australia "Media Watch" has been doing this for years and they do a very good job of it. The reality though is most people just don't care about finding out the truth and a site run by someone as twisted as Musk would be just as bad as any of the media.

And why do you think hes twisted?

It would not be a site like you are describing here, it would be something like metacritic or rotten tomatoes so if he is twisted like you say then his involvement would not have to effect the scores of articles.

He happily bends or twists the truth to meet his own agenda, you only have to look at much of what he is calling unfair or fake news, much of it is quite factual, he just doesn't like it being the centre of attention.  A site that allowed the public to vote would be completely useless, the media definitely has its own agenda, but that is nothing compared to the bias present in the average fan (be it for or against), to think such a system would have any hope of demonstrating anything is idiotic. The only thing it would demonstrate is why such a site can't work.