Detroit: Become Human Reviews: 79 Metacritic, 80 OpenCritic

[DonFerrari]

Azzanation said:

DonFerrari said:

So you admit to be fishing using a strawman argument? Where did anyone besides you said any score that is far from average (that for you if 25 or 40 is the same, then 25 to 10 is the same and 10 to 0 as well right?) is troll (you are also the only one talking about fake review). You are the one changing definitions non-stop to try and make an argument stick, and have failed miserably at it.

When you read the review for GTS and see how it is fake you come and use it. Because people here have read the Detroit and show why it's ridiculous.

Are we discussing Angry Joe? Haven't seem his review cited here. And still Detroit wouldn't dwell on below average (also ignore that gaming average have been sitting about 70 as also show to you in other threads).

No problem you watching Jim, just curious why you would watch negative reviews on a game you don't care on a platform you never play. Will you list the PS games you played yet?

I am saying you and many others are quick to judge a negative review yet how many in here are quick to judge a perfect score? 10,20,30 or 40 % higher or lower should all be treated the same unless the review is complete trash. Again you seem to ignore the great scores yet choose to bash the low scores, its pretty clear here. I bet you would give this game a 10/10 and you want everyone else to think the same. If someone hates the genre or the controls than they can claim it in there review which means the game isn't for everyone. If they state something completely unfair like the graphics are shit but are actually quite good than that's a troll review.

I have seen many reviews who don't believe this game is a 8 so the debate is in the air, clearly its a mixed bag, some love it some hate it. Respect those who hate it just like you respect those who love it. Two completely different reviewers gave the game a 4/10, not just 1 out of nowhere like in my Halo 4/Horizon 2 examples previously. 

I and many others do that because there are completely different reasons for both. In general very negative reviews are done to troll and clickbait, very positive are more because the person really liked.

Both 40 for Detroit and the one for GT5 (that seemly) were explained why they are trash. You still haven't show why the 100 on GTS was trash, and you keep dodging.

I sure would give 10 to GT5 and even GTS, still I'm not a professional reviewer am I? If someone hates the genre and do the review based on this hate that is a troll review. If you don't like the genre you don't need a review trashing the game for you to realize what genre it is for you to avoid. But you are going in circle here.

And funny that you now invented another metric, if it's 2 scores then it isn't trolling.

How much are you going to distort definitions to satisfy yourself?