By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation said:
DonFerrari said:

I'm basing they as troll not only because of the score, but how it was defended, their probable intention and that 40 indicates a game on the unplayable level which this game isn't. And you watched a negative video of a game you don't want to play because?

I'm still waiting for you to show how the 100% score for GTS was unjustified you haven't done it for anyone to agree with you. Also you haven't show any positive troll review, besides changing it to fake, which also you didn't prove it is.

Also waiting for you to prove you are unbiased or say you are.

I know you love GTS so I am using GTS as a prime example to how you are thinking, not how I am thinking, I haven't read the review, but basing off your logic, anything far from the average should be treated as a troll review or fake review. I use the term fake meaning troll because its not a real review, just something for clicks or to hype or drop a products standings. 

I also haven't read the reviews on Detroit so I wouldn't know if its a troll review or not, but I can say this, there are 2 reviews giving the game 4/10 not just 1 which doesn't hold your argument up very well. Also a 4 isn't a broken mess, Angry Joe gives 4s out to slightly below average games, a broken mess would be a 1 or 2. Depends who you listen to.

Yes I watch Jim on YouTube, is there a problem with that? 

So you admit to be fishing using a strawman argument? Where did anyone besides you said any score that is far from average (that for you if 25 or 40 is the same, then 25 to 10 is the same and 10 to 0 as well right?) is troll (you are also the only one talking about fake review). You are the one changing definitions non-stop to try and make an argument stick, and have failed miserably at it.

When you read the review for GTS and see how it is fake you come and use it. Because people here have read the Detroit and show why it's ridiculous.

Are we discussing Angry Joe? Haven't seem his review cited here. And still Detroit wouldn't dwell on below average (also ignore that gaming average have been sitting about 70 as also show to you in other threads).

No problem you watching Jim, just curious why you would watch negative reviews on a game you don't care on a platform you never play. Will you list the PS games you played yet?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."