By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation said:
DonFerrari said:

So now 25% is equal to 40%? And the fact that it's 100 doesn't automatically makes it a troll, as we asked you to prove it is a troll. Do you even know what is an internet troll and what they do?

Your lack of understanding really isn't anything new..

 

I'm still waiting for the list of PS exclusives you played and can prove.

25% or 40% makes no difference, a fake review is a fake review and should not be tolerated, Detroit has received 2 reviews that gave it a 4/10 while GTS has received only 1 review of 10/10 on an average of 75.. that 10/10 sticks out like a sore thumb compared to Detroit where there's multiple reviewers who gave it low numbers. 

Your last sentence baffles me.. what has this got to do with me, I am not a reviewer and I am not rating this game haha.. You come out complaining about a review or reviews not hitting your sweet spot and I am basically telling you to ignore them and just play the damn games. Don't be bias, if you hate the extremely low negative reviews than you should hate the extremely high positive reviews, but you choose to ignore it because.. well are you bias? Do you see me posting about the negative reviews on SOT or SOD2? I don't care as much as you think, I just play the games if they interest me.

Also stay on topic, stop trying to make this personal.

If being 25% or 40% makes no difference, then 0% also doesn't right? And since when did Troll translate to fake? And how can you prove that the 100 is fake? And there were more high grade reviews on GTS as well. Also still waiting for any positive troll review.

It have to do with you that say scores or hate doesn't stop you from playing a game. So I want to know what PS exclusives did you play. I don't let scores stop me from playing, but it also doesn't stop me from complaining about them. But here you are a royal member of the PC master race who have so many good games to play that doesn't have time to discuss on the internet.

I'll stop when you take your own advice. But since you still haven't I'll say that I'm always delighted when the most biased users on VGC ask others to be unbiased... and even worse because they think they aren't biased.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."