Detroit: Become Human Reviews: 79 Metacritic, 80 OpenCritic

[DonFerrari]

Mcube said:

DonFerrari said:

Yes we are, and some are denying they exist because all reviewers are highly regarded professionals with totally neutral behavior, do you believe it?

And talking about those critereas... Gameplay evaluation talk about how fluid and responsive it's, how well done it works, etc. If a game is a QTE gallore you should evaluate how it works (like the time each command stays, if it get the input right, how challenging it's, etc) there isn't a single gameplay standard, you have to at least consider genre...

So if the game have all those cleared no sub 80 is really applicable.

Yeah but every game has em. It would be like deleting Jim Sterlings review of BOTW cause he didnt like how open Zelda was. But with this like this it can ge bad because people can just hate the entire genre but to put people that love David cage´s work on the game for reviews is a bit of a stretch. Its all a bit harder with sites like Metacritic around and being under what most consumers think everyone knows you´re the ´bad guy´ they might not even be trolling they might genuinely dislike the game. 

But yes they do exist and anyone saying they dont is a lie. Its all for the clicks. 

I don't have a problem with a reviewer explaining why he didn't like a game and giving an adequate score for it (but personal enjoyment shouldn't be the biggest factor). But when you hate the genre then the review is already at jeopardy.