By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hynad said:
Azzanation said:

What makes you say a game scored higher by 15% isnt a troll post? How do you make judgement? A troll review is still a fake review.

And where did you do your maths? 100/100 on a game that averages 75 is a 25% difference. But i guess to you guys, unless its a direct 40% in the negative its considered a troll review and lets forgive the 10/10 scores of other games with average metas because reasons.

And where did you do your maths? I took my numbers by going off the review aggregate pages. And the game didn't get a single 100. The highest score it got is 95, and the lowest is 40.

Where did you take your 100? The game stands at 79% on metacritics, and at 80% on opencritics. So where is that 75% coming from?

And funny how you don't go to the length you're going here when it comes to the games on your systems of choice. I expect you to act the same you do here from here on out. Regardless of what system the game is on. Bonus if it's a game you really enjoy.


Also, as Don asked, please point us to the positive troll reviews you speak of.

Owww you probably missed the discussion on SoT where he tried to imply that we were saying the game was bad because the score was low or sales. And not the oposite.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."