Detroit: Become Human Reviews: 79 Metacritic, 80 OpenCritic

[DonFerrari]

Azzanation said:

DonFerrari said:

I'm glad I made up to your expectations. You never fail to come to ours.

Yes I know all games do receive troll reviews, where did I said otherwise? But your construction was hinting at it, and you now it does because every other topic you try to use me as being Sony fanboy as some argument. Again it's funny you doing your passive agressive attacks. If it is small things and I shouldn't care about them, what does that say about you that are criticizing and discussing this with me? No good games to play on PC? I will have to repeat myself so perhaps you read. 40 on a 80 average have much more space to be troll than 95 to be EXTREMELY positive (and you seem to have failed when I explained why those may not really be extremely), still you failed to explain how in VG context a 40 isn't an absurd score for a functional game.

Yes I do know about the unfair meta of GT5, so what? I didn't call this 40 review a troll because of the score, I called it based on its premise of someone that doesn't even like racing and gave the score solely for it being a racer. And for GT you can look other comments I made here, that because of its niche I only regard racing oriented reviews and DF+Arstechnica for the graphical part. All the rest is irrelevant to me since they won't look at what is important to me in a racer. On my personal opinion any score sub 80 for GT is trolling and below 90 is unfair.

Yes you say you play games independent of the score... but not independent of the platform right?

Reviews are personal opinions, if they don't like the game because they don't like the genre than they have the right to give it a low score, clearly indicating that this game isn't for everyone. Which is correct, this game isn't for everyone.

Getting a 100 score for a game sitting on average of 75 is no different to a game getting a 40 on a average of 80 scores. You cannot pick and choose what reviews you accept and cannot. Its rather you balance out the good and the bad reviews or don't complain about it at all. You are clearly nit picking what you only want to read which comes back to my point, who cares?

This has nothing to do with Me, Fanboys, Xbox, PC, Nintendo and even Sony, so stop trying to include them in this.. this is about the review issues YOU have, that's what I am replying to. Don't like them don't read them, why does it matter so much to you?

I clearly stated to you that review scores don't effect my gaming, I just play games regardless of the hate, *hint* You should do the same.

We are talking about professionals that should give professional analysis not purely opinion. There are plenty of technical aspects on games to be evaluated besides "i like it". You need a score on a Fifa or GT to know if you like futball or racing game, really?

It seems that it is hard for you to believe that most VGChartian when commenting on metacritic will say they don't consider the score on metacritic as the main factor, but actually read two or three reviewers that he knows have similar taste before making his purchase decision? And why should any simfan consider the opinion of someone that HATEs the genre and gives her score based on that?

Again you ask why does it matter, as if it's irrelevant, but here you are I believe in the third playstation exclusive in a row talking about it... Remind me the playstation exclusives you have played (and of course can prove) in the last 24 months?