Labo is a huge ripoff and a waste of a great concept (so far)

[duduspace1]

DonFerrari said:

duduspace1 said:

1. My estimation and yours might not be the same, but we are both extrapolating using parameters of our choosing  lacking any standard approach to estimations so I would call that even, however you have a right to disagree on that point.

2. Until you are able to estimate the 'Total cost' went into getting Labo into the hands of customers before jumping the gun and calling it overpriced, expect to be challenged when making such unfounded conclusions and to be enlightened as to where your tunnel vision lies in your analysis.

1 - you haven't given any explanation to make your extrapolation reasonable.

2 - You were claiming it costs similar to GoW, still waiting for any evidence of it. I don't have to do your work for you. I doubt that besides you, anyone here really thinks Labo costs the same to make as GoW.

1. In your opinion I haven't, because you seriously don't get it that the cost that goes into a game getting into customer's hands goes beyond the cost of developing it. If you can't understand that simple logic after agreeing that the cost of developing GoW3 does not totally explain its pricing, I really can't help you because then you are basically just refusing to accept a reality that you yourself have pointed out.

2. Where and when did I make this claim ? For the records, before you twist this discussion completely out of shape, the thrust of my point is that you have shown no basis to claim that Labo is overpriced and as far as I am concerned, you still haven't. The rest of what you say about GOW, GoW3, are frankly speaking distractions and of little relevance at all.

Last edited by duduspace1 - on 27 May 2018