Detroit: Become Human Reviews: 79 Metacritic, 80 OpenCritic

[DonFerrari]

Azzanation said:

Hynad said:

Why don’t you take on CGI-Quality instead?

I think they can both read my post. If I didn't want CGI to read my post I wouldn't have made it that obvious. Thanks for caring though. CGI is welcome to comment back if he wishes. 

DonFerrari said:

Azz as always you like to be wrong right?

If a game is hovering in the 80 range, a 40 review (which is one the broken level) is a more than twice away from the average than the 95, which even if probably much higher than perhaps it should can be understand as someone that really like the game (like if CGI-like was the reviewer) and the genre so he will be distorted higher.

For someone that say have too many great games to play and that his userbase doesn't discuss you enter to many discussion to defend MS and criticize Sony... shall we look at your comments on SoT reviews?

And about the ridiculous claim of everyone needing to have same opinion. For a game that is reasonably well done and doesn't have major flaws averaging 80, the 70-90 range with people liking and disliking the game (without making personal taste get in the way of the objective part) is reasonable. 40 is troll and clickbaiting level.

But I appreciate you infering I'm biased fanboy. You one of the most neutral person on the forums.

 

Way to spin my entire post. I honestly couldn't expect anything different from you so no I am not surprised.

This isn't about being bias, this happens to most games not just PS exclusives. Why do you care so much on these little things? No game is perfect and everyone has the right to there opinion. Its easy to pick out the negative reviews as trolls and easy to keep the extremely positive reviews that aren't trolls. Do you complain about the competitor games copping the same treatment?

Did you know Gran Turismo Sport sits on a 75 meta, did you call out Troll reviews to the 4 Reviewers who gave the game above 90 scores and 1 of those being the only 100 score? That's a bit high above the average correct? With your logic, there troll reviews as well correct? I cant recall you calling them troll reviews though.. interesting.

Like I said I play games no matter the meta score, I suggest you do the same. Also I cannot play my games at work, so ill definitely jumping on some the moment I get home, after I am done replying to these posts at work, oh wait.. you hate Phil for using Tweeter because his the boss and should be making games instead because his the developer and all, I guess because I am the boss at my work I am not allowed to use social media either because I should be making games or something instead of posting on VGC.. 

Bottom line, ignore the scores, just enjoy the games you like, that's what I do.

I'm glad I made up to your expectations. You never fail to come to ours.

Yes I know all games do receive troll reviews, where did I said otherwise? But your construction was hinting at it, and you now it does because every other topic you try to use me as being Sony fanboy as some argument. Again it's funny you doing your passive agressive attacks. If it is small things and I shouldn't care about them, what does that say about you that are criticizing and discussing this with me? No good games to play on PC? I will have to repeat myself so perhaps you read. 40 on a 80 average have much more space to be troll than 95 to be EXTREMELY positive (and you seem to have failed when I explained why those may not really be extremely), still you failed to explain how in VG context a 40 isn't an absurd score for a functional game.

Yes I do know about the unfair meta of GT5, so what? I didn't call this 40 review a troll because of the score, I called it based on its premise of someone that doesn't even like racing and gave the score solely for it being a racer. And for GT you can look other comments I made here, that because of its niche I only regard racing oriented reviews and DF+Arstechnica for the graphical part. All the rest is irrelevant to me since they won't look at what is important to me in a racer. On my personal opinion any score sub 80 for GT is trolling and below 90 is unfair.

Yes you say you play games independent of the score... but not independent of the platform right?