| Kristof81 said: I don't understand all that "woman controversy". Apart from the resistance fighters, spread all over the Europe (not only France), there were over 800,000 woman mobilzed in Soviet Union and soviets, unlike americans, weren't treating woman as auxiliary units. The same thing happened in Yugoslavia, were 100,000 woman served as "full blown soldiers" in the army. Damn, soviets even had female pilots, forming three bomber wings. I'm pretty sure there are many other examples. I though it's more or less common knowledge, but all the sudden it's SJWs propaganda. |
Was that a female french resistance fighter (with prosthetic arm and british dialect) fighting along side british paras (with Katanas on the back) on the field of battle against SchutzStaffel?
I don't care who's propaganda, to me it looks as if they just wanted to show off how much cool stuff they cramed into the game. To the satisfaction of everyone. Certainly not because it has some historical validity. I watched the reveal and it was, as expected, cringy. Most cringeworthy was the moment when they talked WW2 weaponry. Or was it the "Back to you" Guy and the Lady reading of the teleprompter?
What i see is lazy game design and more of exactly the same. Some don't have a problem with it. Good.
I don't mind the name though. Battlefield V.
btw. regarding the post that started the discussion here in this thread:
| Hiku said: So I guess it's upsetting to a number of people that Battlefield V has a woman on the cover. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Humanity has peaked. |
It doesn't seem people have an issue with a woman on the cover, but rather how the whole game is packaged.
You think this would ve caused a similar reaction?
Or did the CoD BlopsIIIIIIII trailer? I don't know. I didn't check.
Hunting Season is done...
