By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
pitzy272 said:

 

I’m not so sure it did sell poory. I just saw this article recently. Four months after TO 1886’s release, the CEO said, “we are well on our way to achieving the sales performance that we sought.”

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/ps4-s-the-order-1886-well-on-its-way-to-meeting-sa/1100-6427891/

Interesting! Admittedly, I hadn't seen that. Much of the assumption came from Sony 'letting them go' and the harsh critic reception.

Seems like we meet on a middle ground of bomb and success, with something that achieved their target but not enough for sony to want to keep with them. So for that purpose it could be said that it bombed.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."