Games should be made "EXCLUSIVE" for one platform again

[DonFerrari]

Otter said:

DonFerrari said:

It just mean that they regarded other things more important. Life is made of choice and they clearly put theirs.

I haven't played a lot of games on Genesis and SNES because I couldn't buy them, some I was able to rent or play at friends house. I don't fret over that since entertainment isn't a right.

Highlighted where I'm actually making a point because I'm struggling to grasp the worth of yours. Of course life is made of choices, of course there are things more important than video games. Lets charge $200 for massive AAA games like GTA and dismiss the increased cost by the fact that if you really want it you will make the choice to pay for it. No one should fret, entertainment isn't a right...

There whole point is that exclusion is unnecessary. The gain is what? A boost from 900p-1080p on your platform of choice? Your eyes will stop caring after 5mins anyway. Games are meant to be fun, they are meant to be experienced. Unless it really compromises the creators vision, lets reduce the barriers to entry.

I have no issue with GTA trying to charge 200, first because I don't care about the game, second is that its game are much more length than others and customers will decide if it is worth. I would think it's a rip-off.

And since my main concern is what I consume, if being exclusive to my platform of choice that is already 90% of the market share for that SW getting a improvement of IQ is a good reason for not releasing in the other platform.

Otter said:

V-r0cK said:

You just added to my point more so.  When you weight up against other priorities in life you realize what games are actually that important to you enough to actually play them.  Just like everybody that has backlog of games, clearly those games weren't important enough to play right away etc...

An exclusive game and a different console doesn't do any harm to anyone so dont hate on it for not investing on them.  If you do hate on it, then then you should hate yourself for having different priorities/financial priorities instead because that game and other console isn't doing anything wrong, it's still there waiting for you.

Yes, hate yourself for having to pay the bills, buy presents for loved ones, invest in social bonds and time with real people *rolls eyes*

You have every reason to question the reasoning which has denied or made it more difficult for you access an experience. If the option is there to remove those barriers and developers choose to enforce them, that is something to dislike. 

Everybody have their lifes, but guess what some have more importance to games and others to concerts. I actually am much more bothered by 60 USD games than 400 USD consoles since it have 0 margin and I buy one while SW I buy like 100 on a gen an they have very large margins.

V-r0cK said:

Otter said:

Yes, hate yourself for having to pay the bills, buy presents for loved ones, invest in social bonds and time with real people *rolls eyes*

You have every reason to question the reasoning which has denied or made it more difficult for you access an experience. If the option is there to remove those barriers and developers choose to enforce them, that is something to dislike. 

No. Hate yourself for wanting the video game industry to make things easier on your life lol

I too have bills, mortgage payments, car payments, tons of love ones I buy presents for, saving up for a wedding, and a large social life with real people too lol

*rolls eyes at those that think their life is more difficult

You aren't allowed to have a hard life but like VG and paying for it instead of consider gaming a social right that should be handed to you even if you don't invest much.