Nuvendil said:
Oh piss off. If you can't see the severe disadvantages of this than you are either blind or wilfully ignoring them for whatever reason. Them doing something for the Switch is not a shield against criticism. If what they are doing is BS then it's BS, end of story. For goodness sake you can't even back up your save file, it's stored in the cloud as well and they outright say they can and will delete save files of inactive accounts. So if you wish to keep your save files, you had better never, ever fail to renew your subscription. Every aspect of this proposal is skin crawlingly consumer hostile on top of being extremely cheap and lazy. They aren't even setting up and operating the streaming service themselves, it's outsourced. |
I can see the disadvantages, while from you and some other fans I can only see complains and "certain" that it would be a good port and easily done. Because still 180 days is quite enough to finish a 10h game and paying 1/3 the cost. Also there are at least 3 other platforms where you can play it.
Nuvendil said:
The source is Daniel Ahmad you genius. Analyst at Niko Partners and highly credible and highly regarded industry insider. It is an iron clad fact that they could have fit the MMLC 1 and 2 on a 4 GB cart. And it is an iron clad fact those cost less than a blue ray so try again. |
So does a 4GB cart cost less than 1 USD? Because a regular costumer can buy a BR disc for like that.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."