By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MrWayne said:
DonFerrari said:

Hiring someone that is less qualified isn't a good policy and government demanding that from companies are making invasions on free market where they should be kept out.

But you essentially answered another person that defied anyone to prove that it was a thing to hire a less qualified female just to hit a quota.

how can you let qualification determine everything, if not all have the same chance of qualifying?
The managers of the largest companies have a huge impact on our society and politics. So it is fair to have a balanced representation there.

This quota could have a negative impact in the short term, but in the long term, companies will ensure that their female employees are given equivalent training to their male colleagues.

Companies need to have a single objective, follow the profit. Anything else is bad for business. If the money come from hiring more female leaders to give a different vision to the company that is good, they decided. If the government demands someone hire more woman and the company need to hire less qualified to fill a quota the company will be less efficient, cost more and lose money.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."