Intrinsic said:
Thats taking this in a totally different direction. But what you are saying feeds into what I am saying too, so I am going to play along. Yes, a $300 box in 2013 would have been less powerful than a $400 box. As would a $300 NS be less powerful than a $200 one. Which brings us right back to what I was saying when I said that sony or nintendo or MS are selling these consoles at market value with very little to no mark up. That means there is zero advantage for selling at whatever price they are selling for as long as theer isn't any markup. Which means that its ridiculous to suggest that sony (or any one else) selling a console at $400 (with no mark up) is somehow in a better position than someone else (in this case nintendo) that sold their own console at $300 (also with no markup). They all have the exact same issue. They are selling their consoles with no mark up. How is it somehow better for sony cause they could get their own price down to $300 when in theory nintendo could also get their won price down to $199 or whatever. |
Ok i agree with you.
Some people are saying a PS4 vs NSW comparison is unfair because its $400 vs $300 but at the same time they dont want to take into account the differences between the two devices.
$400 for a powerful stationary console and $300 for a powerful portable console are appropriate launch prices and a side-by-side comparison is fair.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.