Intrinsic said:
I don't think you are downplaying sony, or trying to. What I don't get is the notion that launching at a higher price puts sony (or anyone for that matter) in a better position to drop prices and in turn stimulate sales. While that is technically correct, its also incorrect. It would be all round correct if sony launched at a higher price by imposing a price premium; basically say it was selling the PS4 for about 30%-50% more than its actual market value. In a case like that, it then has the wiggle room to drop prices and still be making a profit. But if the console is sold at break even prices, as it was with teh PS4 and as it is with the NS (I would like to believe the latter) then it means both platforms are in the exact same position and both have the exact same hurdles to overcome to get prices lower. It may be harder to do for one than the other, but thats not out business. Basically, its a moot point; sony launched at $400. Dropped its price by 25% to spur sales as you said, nothing stopping nintendo from droping its own price by 25% too when its good and ready. Still doesn't change the fact that the PS4, NS and even the XB1 would have all sold more than whatever they sold if they were all launched at prices lower than whatever they launched it. How long those sales can be sustained is a another matter. |
The thing i think needs to be taken into account is if those consoles were $100 cheaper at launch than they would have either been sold at big losses or the hardware would be different.
A $300 PS4 in 2013 or $200 Switch in 2017 would not be the same thing as we got so its hard to say that sales would be significantly higher because we dont know exactly how well these theoretical consoles would be recieved.
Many people would likely jump on board for a $300 PS4 but how do we know alot of people wouldnt either pick XBO based on multiplats performing better or just keep playing on PS3/360 because PS4 was a lackluster next-gen upgrade?
Same goes for a $200 Switch, instead of being roughly mid-way between last-gen & current-gen consoles and able to get alot of updated previous gen ports and a handful of current gen downports, it would basically be a Vita+ and just get a handful of previous gen downports.
For all we know, these cheaper versions would have sold even less than in reality.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.