By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sethnintendo said:
DonFerrari said:

Please pick up your time machine and go to the founding fathers and complain that they saw into the future to make a system that would favor the republicans...

There is a reason older people are republican and younger are democratics... older people have had enough experience to stop believing in fantasies.

Older people likely have accumulated more wealth thus in favor of tax cuts (which allows goes more towards upper brackets giving middle and low income tax payers chump change).

Republican party has been able to court christians (which there are more of in old population) somehow even though they have just as many or more sex scandals than other parties.  Mainly able to hold onto them by being anti abortion.

Last republican to give a damn about the environment was probably Theodore Roosevelt.  Somehow hating on environmentalist became a cool thing to do for Republicans even though we all live on this fucking earth.  Sure you can go too extreme for environmentalism but it shouldn't be business or environment.  Both sides need to come together and try to utilize the land which works for both environment and business. 

Apparently republicans can't stop believing in fantasy either.  Enjoy your stay in "heaven" when you die.

1 - Older people accumulate wealth together with wise and experience. The young people buying 10 USD coffe won't. But they certainly will blame the elder and republicans for it.

2 - Republicans court better the christians because they don't publically berate then all the time as the democrats.

3 - That is because environmentalist are self-serving high horses in the majority. As most movement people that see themselves as better than the ones not in the movement and that keep attacking everyone else as evil.

4 - Everyone probably believes in some sort of ideal society and others even think it is possible. I'm atheist so I have zero issue with you desiring me heaven or hell, but we can see your intentions of bad outcome for someone that disagree with you.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."