| The Fury said: ... so it doesn't have a campaign? Even if some people didn't play it, the BO3 campaign was actually better than most, I actually completed it and I'd never completed a BOs campaign. In CoD I'd only completed MW1, 2 and 3 for the story sake. But BO3s actually had more than just that in it, it had other modes inside the campaign, loadouts and stuff. |
I've completed Call of Duty 1, 2, Modern Warfare, Modern Warfare 2, Black Ops, World at War, Ghosts and set to do WW2 in the next few months.
| konnichiwa said: COD always released with a singplayer campaign and most of the times bitch about how it sucks and they only keep the game for the MP....Now they get rid of the SP and people feel entitled to have one. It is just a human thing. |
Black Ops 3 on 7th gen had no campaign.
| fatslob-:O said: Except those franchises you mentioned don't even have annual releases and some of them you listed such as Far Cry, don't have at all similar experiences to CoD and it's far longer too ... Good for you and the others if you like the new game mode or multiplayer but that doesn't mean that single player campaigns isn't a large portion of CoD customers including some of them that never finish it just like how some don't touch the MP for more than 3 hours ... |
I don't see how getting less for your coin is a good thing... Yet looking at this thread, several people like getting less bang for your buck, I just don't get it.
Money shouldn't even be part of the equation for a multi-billion dollar franchise like Call of Duty.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
