Intrinsic said:
Better than none wouldn't you say? Simple fact of the matter is that the only way MS can compete with sony on the software side would either take ridiculous sums of money or time or even both. There is absolutely nothing that can be donw about it in say the next two or three years. Cause its not just about releasing a whle batch of new IPs within a year of eachother thats required to match or surpass sony's output. Its about having 2-3 great IPs at least every year, and being able to go 2-3 years before any of those IPs see a sequel. So right now, what we see Phil doing is all we really can see, doesn't mean hes not working on the real problem, its just gonna take some time to see. |
Well he have had 10 years at the position to start that, so saying from now it would take 3 years to start releasing something and still would take longer for 3 a year shouldn't excuse the idling of prior.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
