By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hiku said:
Nem said:

Sure they can.

But the question here is if it makes sense, and it doesn't. It's still a good game. Enjoyable to play. It just wasn't what some people wanted it to be. It was too action'y. But heck it was a ton of fun to play!

I do agree with you about where they should have gone. I also have no interest in playing RE7 and have checked out from the series until something more akin to the classic games comes around (RE1/2/3/4/5). But, i didnt hate RE6 at all. I just think it felt streched too thin to make the 3 campaigns.

If it's a good or enjoyable game or not depends on who you ask. The general consensus is that RE's quality gradually declined since RE4. It may very well have reached a point of quality that a large enough amount of people that Capcom surveyed were not ok with.

I don't disagree with that, as i said. But it was a fun game. It wasn't a game i wasn't enjoying while playing it. It wasn't a survival horror, and people had issue with that. If they had condensed the 3 campaigns in only one it would've been a much better game imo. But, it wasn't a bad game. Your scores don't show a terrible game either.

Unless you mean the use scores, wich i will have to lol to.

Last edited by Nem - on 10 May 2018