| Conina said: Point taken. I only looked for "2160p" and forgot that 16:10-displays were still popular back then. My bad. But I doubt that I would have been happy with one of these monitors for gaming with their low frequency (up to 41 Hz), they were more specialized for static images. |
You weren't going to be doing 60fps on hardware back then at any super high resolution anyway, hardware had insufficient frame-buffers for starters.
But the point I was trying to convey was that you could have those resolutions.
| JRPGfan said: 350mm^2 is Huge..... noway thats going into a new switch. |
Agreed. Way to expensive.
| JRPGfan said: also "The chip delivers 1.3 TFLOPs of peak FP32 performance" "The chip delivers all of this compute at just 20W". That doesnt sound impressive to me. |
Maybe it is because you are only focused on flops.
Stop doing that... And you might finally wake up to the fact there is more to a SoC than single precision floating point.
| JRPGfan said: Maybe Nintendo Switch's to AMD APUs for the next Switch? |
No.
| HoangNhatAnh said: It isn't like there won't be a small custom X3 chip which is made especially for New Switch |
They won't need to. Nor does Nintendo seem to have the desire of going the semi-custom route anymore either.
There is already a drop-in replacement chip for a new Switch that has been on the market for several years... And she can offer 50% or more performance in the same power envelope... And in my opinion is what the Switch should have debuted with in the first place.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
