By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
thismeintiel said:
JRPGfan said:

Yes I do.

Why? because they where allowing people to come look, at their progess and where cutting back on the stuff that goes into makeing them. The "deal" was they wouldnt make any Nukes for 12 more years.

So yes, even with the "deal" in place their still makeing them, but its 12years out,.... vs now, they might have nukes next year.

Oh, because they promised, huh? I'm guessing you'd be the kind of person who would entrust your financials to a known embezzler and gambling addict because he promised he wouldn't steal from you. Iran is not to be trusted. And the agreement gives them too much power to delay inspections, as well as not covering military bases. In essence, it accomplishes nothing but giving a known sponsor of terrorism more money to do so. 

no, not because they promised, because international nuclear scientists are confirming every few months that no nuclear efforts are taking place. 

 

the deal was in place to allow the international community to check this independently and NOT taking Iran's word for it. 

 

please inform yourself before making such a stupid, uninformed rethorical question.

 

on a side note, the money that was unfrozen was already Iran's money. it's no financial support. it's like a burglar returning money he stole from you if you agree to let him check your house every now and then, then when you do accept his deal to receive your money back he still spits in your face and tells you to fuck off. 

 

that's a much more correct analogy