| konnichiwa said: Well not always anti-consumer, last example is about the Japanese bus drivers on strike who choose to not go on the street but drive for free and let no passenger pay them. The public opinion was very positive about the strike while the guys on top have to explain why so much money got lost. |
In this case, it is anti-consumer ...
Aside from the executives or professors who teach at university/college, public school teachers are one of the higher salaried professions in the educational sector ... (they get paid far more than private school teachers despite the fact that they are delivering comparable education quality)
The guys at the "top" in this case is the government itself who gave teachers a sanctioned monopoly but then they get even more greedy by refusing to service the public who already overpays for them ? (it's clearly the public teachers here who needs to be questioned)
Hmm, I think it's public school teachers who need to be taught a "lesson" in humility to see just how fragile they are and by that we need to vote most of them out of power so that we can stop wasting our funds on them when there's arguably more cost effective options ... (let's see how they like being treated by the "free market" cause they seem to be afraid of consumers giving them lower pay 
)
Public school teachers should stop pretending that their jobs are socially prestigious when nearly everybody has a high school diploma so their customers are the masses, not the elites ...
