By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SWORDF1SH said:
duduspace1 said:

I did not mention anybody in my post. I mentioned Haterz.....and they do exist. Are you one of them ? If you are not one I see no reason for you to reference my post. I will say no more on the issue. If the person whose post I responded to has no problem with my post, I see no reason why you should.

Why are you taking a post that makes no reference to you so personal ?

My post was aimed at both of you. And no you didn't mention anybody in your point and that makes the issue worse. Instead it's passive jabs not addressed to anybody. Since there isn't really an issue of people saying Labo will flop to troll, it's kinda pointless to bring up unless you name the few that you have an issue with. Btw, having these discussions you might realise they have valid points for having that opinion. 

My point stands that you 2 having this discussion about something that doesn't really exist makes other people reading believe that there is an issue, hence why I said it causes more damage than trolling. 

And to top it all off, it feels a little rushed to already say that their opinions are wrong based on a few days of Amazon charts. 

Firsty, I dont think you have a monopoly of determining what is or is not an issue. 

Secondly, why are you now acknowledging that there exists opinions that could be wrong or right based on a few days of Amazon charts ? Is that some kind of reverse trolling or what exactly ?  And just in case you missed it, my entire point is that it is premature to make any assumptions either way.

Labo is marketed as a 'Toy'....even has 'Toy-con' as part of its marketing and is unlike traditional games so why should anybody be tagging it a flop this early in its lifecycle ?

Last edited by duduspace1 - on 08 May 2018