LudicrousSpeed said:
Ironic, because you could just as easily saw God of War 4 isn’t God of War. But it’s something different for the franchise yet still a great game, same as RE4. My vote is RE4 because over a decade later we’re still seeing games heavily influenced by it. GoW4 doesn’t really innovate anything in the industry, just in the franchise itself. I can also replay the shit out of RE4. I doubt I’ll replay GoW. |
Well I haven't played GoW4 yet. And as I replied to someone here, if GoW4 is as similar to RE4 as he claim then I probably won't like it.
But since I don't like RE4 and what it did to RE I can't vote for it being better, unless after I play GoW4 I see it is even worse but then I would be voting for who is worse not who is better.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."