theRepublic said:
That sounds an awful lot like the "Nintendo Seal of Quality" that is generally credited with getting third parties pissed off at Nintendo and causing them to bolt for Sony and the original Playstation. For that reason, I'm not sure that Nintendo or third parties would go for something like that. Re-releasing critically acclaimed games or million sellers as "player's choice" or "platinum" is a more realistic option in my opinion. It would probably go over better for all parties if the games had already proved themselves instead of being released with a seal. |
The old Seal of Quality was a mixed blessing. It did kinda help to save the industry, since the Atari would allow every piece of crap in the world to be released, and Nintendo's strict quality control cut most of the crap out. And then they kept their super tight grip of quality control for years until there were finally serious competitors and it was too expensive to make crappy games, so the Seal was irrelevant and it hurt them. But at first it was a huge benefit.
No console company can afford to ever do that again though.