By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NoCtiS_NoX on 29 April 2018
Edit Thread
VGPolyglot said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:

What's justifiable for you? Does reviewer should be subjective?

Reviewing a game has a scale to be followed. It shouldn't be subjective. As much as possible you should be objective because you are being paid to review a game and liking and reviewing are two different things.
Reviewing a game should have a scale. 
I will use GT reviews (shame they are gone)
They use a scale

  • Presentation
  • Design
  • gameplay
  • story

If a game review is trying to be completely objective (which I don't even think is possible), then it shouldn't come with a review score, because it'd essentially just be an analysis of what the game is and what it does.

I am not good with English but I never claim completely. I said as much as possible.
Reviewers job is to educate the people on what they should expect. It shouldn't be about his opinions only. 
Hence I said there should be a scale on how will they review it.


Since you removed and ignore the list and now with more examples. Do you think there score is justifiable? They are always outside the norm for famous games. I am not going to pretend that there is nothing wrong here.