AngryLittleAlchemist said:
"Okay, then, it's your turn. Explain to me why "people who do not like cinematic games and do not like that other people can like something they do not enjoy themselves" constitutes a wide range of subgroups. What are these subgroups? And how, exactly, am I generalizing "people who do not like cinematic games and do not like that other people can like something they do not enjoy themselves"?" Uhh ... I'm not saying it's a bunch of subgroups that identify under that one banner. I am literally saying you are making a blanket statement of a bunch of different groups and putting them under one banner. That's literally my point. And you proved it by changing the definition of what stances we were talking about, three times. I'm not saying those two extra subgroups exist under one larger subgroup. I'm saying that you're throwing all of the different stances of debate under one blanket, which you are. And your counter to that is pretty much "well my original comment said x so it's okay". "Edit: Also, I got to say that you not understanding that I did those edits on purpose is pretty funny." Huh? Ok, I know we're "arguing" here but I call foul. I never even pointed out that you edited one of your previous comments, or implied it. I knew you edited one of your previous comments on purpose. That's exactly why I didn't point it out. It would be like a literal physical embodiment of Tom walking into a Jerry trap. |
You're still not saying anything at all. Nothing but hot air. Be specific. Give me details. What subgroups are you talking about? Come on, you can do it. Explain your point. WHO are all these people you are talking about? WHO are all these different groups?
And your "three separate times" thing is bullshit because I'm talking about the same group that I defined in my first post. You aren't making any sense at all.
So, for the last time, EXPLAIN WHO ALL THESE SUBGROUPS ARE.
I LITERALLY told you who I'm talking about. I defined it for you in clear English. Now you do the same.
If not then, seriously, in perfect honesty, I'm just going to conclude that your reading comprehension is terrible.
As far as the editing thing goes, you said "(in which case I do not see what's funny ... especially because you said that two replies after I edited a comment). " ... or, wait, did you not understand that I was annoyed because I replied to your post before you edited it?
