| pokoko said:
|
"Okay, then, it's your turn. Explain to me why "people who do not like cinematic games and do not like that other people can like something they do not enjoy themselves" constitutes a wide range of subgroups. What are these subgroups? And how, exactly, am I generalizing "people who do not like cinematic games and do not like that other people can like something they do not enjoy themselves"?"
Uhh ... I'm not saying it's a bunch of subgroups that identify under that one banner. I am literally saying you are making a blanket statement of a bunch of different groups and putting them under one banner. That's literally my point. And you proved it by changing the definition of what stances we were talking about, three times. I'm not saying those two extra subgroups exist under one larger subgroup. I'm saying that you're throwing all of the different stances of debate under one blanket, which you are. And your counter to that is pretty much "well my original comment said x so it's okay".
"Edit: Also, I got to say that you not understanding that I did those edits on purpose is pretty funny."
Huh? Ok, I know we're "arguing" here but I call foul. I never even pointed out that you edited one of your previous comments, or implied it. I knew you edited one of your previous comments on purpose. That's exactly why I didn't point it out. It would be like a literal physical embodiment of Tom walking into a Jerry trap.
