Pemalite said:
Because that is an assertion.
Of course Activision has a budget, but if you think Activision cutting the single player is going to automagically result in a better multiplayer, then you are kidding yourself.
Once you start to delve into other logical fallacies like Ad Hominem, then you have lost the argument. Good work, you lost any argument you had.
No.
You didn't answer my question, you completely ignored it and side stepped it. |
1. Oh please, why do you think there are rumors of Activision skipping on the campaign in the first place. They run the statistics and decided it becoming more pointless. COD campaigns are pretty short and they had 3 years. So I doubt they ran out of time.
2. Cool, all ten people can play the single-player mode in COD in 10 years. What keeps a game going for a long time is a solid multiplayer. Take a look at counter strike source.
3. No, I'm just stating a fact that you criticize me for thinking there might be a pubg / battle royal mode which isn't far-fetched and heavily rumor.
4. Yes please, you might learn something.
5. This whole discussion started based on the question "is it worth it to add a single player". You judge worth by how much money you make PROFIT wise. Sure adding a single player might increase sells, but might not be enough to justify the high cost of adding a single player mode in the first place.