Pemalite said:
Again. Irrelevant.
It is Call of Duty. Activision not only has the funds to finance the game... But they also have the resources to build said game.
I'm aware.
Are you saying that potentially millions of gamers opening their wallets for the single player component isn't worth it?
So... If Bethesda was to hypothetically release a new Elder Scrolls game, it will potentially sell less than Skyrim? Is that the message you are trying to convey here? |
1. No not irrelevant. If the same people completed the campaign willing to purchase the game just for the multiplayer, why make a single player?
2. Oh boy. Do you realize that even Activision has a budget right? Why spend money on something that is useless.
3. Then you must realize you're a hypocrite.
4. Check number 1 for reference.
5. More sells does not equal more profit. Nowadays to compete you have to spend a lot more money than before (compared to 2011) and hope to sell way more copies. Not to mention a single player game like Skyrim takes a lot more time to create than a multiplayer game like pubg and cod.