Pemalite said:
Snoopy said:
1. How many people play COD and don't touch the multiplayer? A small number I can guarantee. Probably less than 10%.
|
Again. Irrelevant.
Snoopy said:
2. The multiplayer can be improved and they have a lot of competition so they need to be on their A game constantly. COD multiplayer is good currently, just needs to improve.
|
It is Call of Duty. Activision not only has the funds to finance the game... But they also have the resources to build said game.
No need for excuses like "More resources spent on Multi". - It's not going to happen. Activision will just keep laughing all the way to the bank.
Snoopy said:
3. This whole no single player is hypothetical as well.
|
I'm aware.
Snoopy said:
4. They can probably profit even more without a single player. Look at Pubg and fortnite.
|
Are you saying that potentially millions of gamers opening their wallets for the single player component isn't worth it?
I think you need to think on this a bit more to come to an appropriate conclusion.
Snoopy said:
5. Yes Skyrim did well in 2011. However, this is 2018. I know time flies. Everyone wants to be the next fortnite, pubg, league of legends, ect. The money you make on microtransactions and all you have to do is update the game is great for business.
|
So... If Bethesda was to hypothetically release a new Elder Scrolls game, it will potentially sell less than Skyrim? Is that the message you are trying to convey here?
|
Horizon, BOTW and God of War are proof enough that AAA SP games are and will always have their audience. Far from niche, I will add to make sure my comment isn't taken and turned around through some stupid spin... There's money to be made for SP games produced with care and respect for the audience's expectations.
