Call of Duty Black Ops IIII Development Is A Disaster

[Snoopy]

Pemalite said:

Snoopy said:

Not good numbers at all

...That's millions of gamers.

If the campaign is fun, people will play it.

ArchangelMadzz said:

I got ghosts on the cheap second hand and played for a week and sold it, same with WW2 except it took almost a month.

BO3 was great, played that game throughout the year. Advanced warfare was good for 2 months until all the issues became known and I couldn't stand playing it anymore. And I completely skipped and didn't buy Infinite Warfare, but from what I've seen of it it was terrible. 

At this point I can tell whether I'd like a COD or not without playing it. 

Ghosts was the last CoD Campaign I actually completed. Holy crap were the visuals bad.
The story was just the same tired rehashed rubbish too.

World at War was a ball of fun back in the day.

Only Call of Duty game I haven't gotten is World War 2, I buy the games for the off chance I might play the campaign when I have time/bored and to keep my game library consistent and complete.

If the titles shift to Multiplayer-only, then I won't be purchasing them anymore, I'll make the clean break.

Yeah, those millions of gamers didn't even beat the game which means they spend most of their time on multiplayer. Skip the campaign and focus on making multiplayer great. Also, it would be great if new COD were 40 dollars.

Last edited by Snoopy - on 20 April 2018