Call of Duty Black Ops IIII Development Is A Disaster

[Pemalite]

Snoopy said:

jason1637 said:

For WW2 50.4% started the campaign and 22.3% beat the campaign.

Not good numbers at all

...That's millions of gamers.

If the campaign is fun, people will play it.

ArchangelMadzz said:

I got ghosts on the cheap second hand and played for a week and sold it, same with WW2 except it took almost a month.

BO3 was great, played that game throughout the year. Advanced warfare was good for 2 months until all the issues became known and I couldn't stand playing it anymore. And I completely skipped and didn't buy Infinite Warfare, but from what I've seen of it it was terrible. 

At this point I can tell whether I'd like a COD or not without playing it. 

Ghosts was the last CoD Campaign I actually completed. Holy crap were the visuals bad.
The story was just the same tired rehashed rubbish too.

World at War was a ball of fun back in the day.

Only Call of Duty game I haven't gotten is World War 2, I buy the games for the off chance I might play the campaign when I have time/bored and to keep my game library consistent and complete.

If the titles shift to Multiplayer-only, then I won't be purchasing them anymore, I'll make the clean break.