By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot said:
pitzy272 said:

What are you talking about? Your comments sometimes are so odd, and you frequently seem to go against what people say just for the sake of doing so.

Scoring a game fairly with an open mind based on your experience with it does NOT qualify as a biased view. And that obviously has nothing to do with what I was talking about in my post. Also, bias:  prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.

Reviews are based on a subjective emotion/feeling while playing a game, trying to act impartial/unbiased when you're going to do it, even subconsciously, is just setting yourself up for something that you can never truly commit to. Then again, we're just looking at the low scores, but that ignores that the same thing could be occurring for the high scores too.

Except you can do a technical and objective analysis instead of more emotional driven.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."