By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Faust said:

im glad u asked. Im not Mueller so i cant say for sure, but my guess is that he wants to prosecute him for something bigger, and im glad he is not focused solely on the Russia thing and he is actually looking at his financial ties around the world, cuz I happen to believe the Russia scandal has blown out of proportion and the real meat is somewhere else (money or lack of).

And honestly, i could have gone further with other instances of criminal behavior but i didn't want to expand on other issues to make things easier, but im finding oddly entertainment reading some excuses, so im gonna make a list of a few issues that  i can think of out of my mind right now to find out if you actually care about any issue regarding this Guy.

 

Mar a Lago.- leave aside the fact that he promised not to golf while being president (thats irrelevant), this guy is actually making money by golfing on his own                        properties. So yeah, he is using his office to make a profit which is illegal in case you didnt know.

Family business.- He appointed her Daughter and son in law to work for him in the white house. Also Illegal

Drone Strikes.- Obama did it... still Illegal.

Trump "university".- Even if you are the president fraud is Illegal 

More obstruction of Justice.- When Mueller asked for the documents of the guy who was investigating Price's corruption before he was fired by Trump, man       im not gonna lie, that made me extremely happy.
 
 Now, spin it as hard as you can to see if you get the grand prize

@Bold LOL, yeap you've definitely went into full conspiracy theory mode now ... (Alex Jones would be proud) 

You say "criminal" but you pointing his private school lawsuit means you're oblivious to the fact that it was "civil lawsuit", more evidence that you truly don't give don't a shit since you can't be bothered to do any research ... 

Your first link is fail since the presidents and vice-presidents exempt from that statute ... 

As for your second link, the Justice department says otherwise ... 

Notice in your third link that you had to resort to using the "opinion" section ...

You don't know jack, do you ? I'll be waiting for you to demonstrate that you're educated about US law or that you'll be grasping at straws ...