BraLoD said:
Anything he touches that's not Nintendo. Even Kotaku has called the site out some years ago, the scores appear random with weird games getting higher than notable ones, though I've personally only seem 100s for Nintendo games, I can't guarantee it has always been like that. It's the only yellow score The Last of Us got. And why? Because it wasn't a characterless mobile game where if Joel dies there is no continue and you get another random char. Basically because the game had great story telling over very well thought chars instead of permadeath. He score it down because it was not what he wanted, not because it was bad. Got even harsher with some of Microsoft's Horizon games, gave it a 2/10. |
pastro243 said:
He gives 40s to every civilization game, gave a 60 to Horizon, a 60 to Uncharted 2, 40 to the witness, a 20 to Forza Horizon 2, 40 to Infamous second son, 20 to Beyond two souls, 20 to Halo 4, etc... |
A 60 to Uncharted 2 and TLoU?? And a 40 to the Witness? Why in the hell has MC not booted him? How can they keep a reviewer that consistently scores THAT much lower than the average? What a joke. I’m surprised people haven’t complained to MC. QtT really could screw up GoW’s score. I didn’t think it could ever maintain its 95, but every recent review has only increased its score. But a 60% could ruin that.
