John2290 said:
What chemical attacks? There was and still is no confirmation, it's all suspected. Why would they use chemical weapons when they'd already won? If there was a chemical attack last weekend Teresa May would have been the first to show the proof when announcing to the UK. Precision strikes are not fucking precise, even today. This is nothing more than a show to Russia. Don't believe the shite that this is a one time deal, Trumps composure with not one falter and no congress approval, it's all to obvious. This is an act of war against Russia plain and simple. Gritting my teeth while I wait for Russia's response. |
France, along with the US and 7 other nations have reviewed their intelligence and confirmed a chemical attack took place in Douma. Obviously you lack a understanding of the authority of the President to approve such actions so that doesn't need to be highlighted further. You say this was an act of war against Russia yet the locations hit were not Russian FOB locations; so take a step off your hyperbole soap box.
I find this a common thread of people who don't know enough to know they don't know what they're talking about. There will not be a war between NATO and Russia, especially over strikes against the well documented monster Assad. Russia does not have the means to conduct a war against NATO and if you're counting on support from China or Iran in any conflict with NATO you'll be sorely disappointed. China depends too much on trade to maintain order at home, Iran has zero ability to conduct any major war activities whatsoever, and technological gap between NATO and these nations is monumental. Not to mention Iran has zero desire for any conflict due to reasons too numerous to detail here.
So continue gritting your teeth if it helps you deal with the exaggerated ideas you keep coming up with.
