Or people should just make an average for themselves. Pick two/three of the worst reviews, pick two/three of the middle one, pick two/three of the best ones, read them (or even if you don't want to bother, check their sum-up views), and see how the reasoning holds across them all. If the worst reviews happen to have a similar, justifiable reasoning than the others but on a negative note, then it's not clickbait, or at the very least it is pretty well masqueraded and quite frankly can pass for a legit one. If it happens to be a bunch of nonsense and extreme nit-picking, in huge contrast to the rest (even the two other bad reviews), then you know where they might be coming from.
The same applies to the 10/10 reviews, btw. Sometimes you can sense they're legit, and sometimes you can sense they're pure bias, by using this comparison model. The thing about reviews is that you don't have to just stick to the number alone, even if that's what people generally do I guess.
