By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
HoangNhatAnh said:

Exactly, so you just contradicted yourself about graphic because Xbox 1 X is the best choice for 4K gaming out there, ps4 pro power is nothing compare to it. Well done

The PC makes the Xbox One X look like a calculator.
4k? Please. PC can exceed that, by several multiples.

HoangNhatAnh said:

If a same game on ps4 and xbox 1, what will you play? Heh, so many third party games on Xbox 1 X have better resolution and performance: 

Yeah, i though as long as it have better graphic, you will get it?

There is more to the system than just resolution and performance.

* You have cost. - Xbox One X is more expensive.

* Controllers. - Personal preference, some people prefer Symmetrical analogue sticks, some prefer Asymmetrical. My preference depends on the type of game personally. Fighters = Symmetrical, FPS = Asymmetrical.

* Online network. - Xbox has the advantage here no doubt.

* Amount of games. - Playstation 4 wins with an 18.5% larger library.

* Number of exclusives. - Playstation 4 wins hands down. Can't even remember the last Xbox One exclusive, games on PC don't count.

* Other features like Hard Drive support, Media support and so on can fall in favor of either console. I.E. Internal up-gradable drives in the Playstation 4, 4k Blu-Ray on the Xbox One.


In short, if you own either an Xbox One X or Playstation 4, you would have certainly weighed up the Pro's and Con's of each platform and made an appropriate purchasing decision the meets your own needs/wants and desires. - Thus there is no wrong purchasing choice.

DonFerrari said:

That wasn't his question or point. It was strictly that the graphics doesn't improve the enjoyment. Glad we cleared your pointless attacks.

Considering that the main benefit the Xbox One X brings over the Playstation 4 Pro is resolution... Not everyone is going to actually care if it's the technically superior platform.
Heck, people were proclaiming how amazing Uncharted was last generation visually despite it being rendered at only 720P~. And yet... PC had 4k back in 2001 during the PS2's reign and you didn't see console games magically jump ship.

In the end... The Xbox One X isn't providing visual a generation ahead of the Pro. A purchaser of either platform would likely be happy with either purchase.

DonFerrari said:

That wasn't his question or point. It was strictly that the graphics doesn't improve the enjoyment. Glad we cleared your pointless attacks.

That depends. Graphics can increase immersion which results in an increase in enjoyment.

LudicrousSpeed said:

Unless I’m totally crazy a gaming PC + Doom or a Scorpio + Doom is more expensive than Doom on the Switch he already owns.

I have a spare PC that dates back to the Wii era. It can run Doom better than the Switch. How many console generations has Nintendo gone through? ;)

Those platform costs are cumulative.

Sure the main difference between X1X and PS4Pro is the resolution (with the price it makes), and certainly if you play the same game on both and they were correctly ported the one in X1X will look better and you will enjoy more. The only problem on that I pointed is that I basically play majorly (like 90%) exclusives, so for that X1X wouldn't do me much good.

HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

You are so confuse. What point are you trying to make? You accuse me of fanboyism and not having a HW, then go to say you have then but will only bash if someone attack Nintendo...

There is no attack to Nintendo on this, you are the one attacking and saying non-sense. As VGP said, don't take criticism to companies are an attack to you that you fight back by doing personal attacks.

Have I said Switch is bad or any Nintendo game is bad on this thread???

Who bashed Switch price and it's graphic in this thread? I must wonder

So criticizing Switch graphics on a thread talking about graphics is bashing? In what type of world criticism torwards a company is worst than personal insults?

HoangNhatAnh said:
Pemalite said:

No it is not portable. Put Portable PC's exist if that is what you desire.
Some older notebooks also allow for upgrade-able MXM GPU's as well.

As for all those games... I know you are trying to be smart and everything... But... The PC will get them all, it's only a matter of when, not if.
And it will look and play better than the original. ;)

But the real question is... Will the Switch get PC exclusives like StarCitizen, Civilization, StarCraft, Company of Heroes, Age of Empires, Total War, Anno, Settlers, Quake, Unreal Tournament... The list goes on?

Checkmate.

Correct, so no need to buy console as long as PC will have all the games of them. I only want to ask you a question: i want to play Xenoblade 2 and next Fire Emblem on the go right now, any option? Also, i have no interest in those pc games you mentioned, i don't want my favorite series die because piracy either, i only pirate game that is not on Nintendo systems

Yes accuse me of a lot of things and them put your high horse to confess you pirate as long as it isn't on a Nintendo system.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."