| John2290 said: Huh? Every aspect of Nioh is well above average to great and the comat is above steller. The only mediocre aspect of Nioh is it's forgettable story. Same with Bloodborne, the combat is, or was stellar until Nioh surpassed it. Bloodborne is probably the most polished game of this generation, I'd rather a polished game that doesn't try to add narrative if it takes away the polished feel. They knew what to cut out and focused on male the game tight and .... i don't even know why I'm replying to this. You're entitled to your opinion...even if it's wrong. Critical and public aclaim for both games there bud. |
I guess this is why I avoid direct game discussions because of how subjective they are.
Visually nioh looks like a PS3 game, has a forgetable story and forgetable score.
Bloodborne feels like a technically rushed game and again non existant story.
Snd you honestly think bloodbornes combat was was great???? No, it was tactical and very punishing, doesnt change the fact that you basically only had one string of combos based on whatever weapon you were using or that the strategy to beating most enemies boilt down to the same thing.
Doesnt chanhe the fact that both games have crazy long loading screens.
But lets agree to disagree, cause these are all opinions. All I will say is I rather get 75% across the board, than 100% in one area and 50% everywhere else.
You are sounding lilw-i said those gsmes are i mentioned are bad.
