By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 12 April 2018
Edit Thread
The_Liquid_Laser said:
DonFerrari said:

Still just because two variables in the same space have varied similarly doesn't mean they are correlated...

When you also have strong evidence that without that variable or in opposition you also had similar results you can't say they are correlated

What is this "strong evidence" you speak of?  Please be specific.  It's already clear that the majority of winners have BC, and the majority of losers don't have BC.  You must be referring to something else.  What is it?

Majority of something happening for two variables don't correlate them...

Or let's say if you found that majority of bald white man are fat, while majority of slim white man have hair would you say being fat and bald are correlated??? That is a very false scientific way that facebook posts use.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."