zorg1000 said:
Such a stupid argument, nobody is saying graphics shouldnt improve, were saying a game doesnt automatically become better with improved visuals. If you take two versions of the same game and everything is identical except one version has moderately better visuals, it doesnt necessarily mean someone will enjoy it more. Obviously we want graphics and hardware in general to improve over time since many gameplay elements can only be introduced with better tech. |
If you want graphics to improve, then if everything else from both versions is the same then the graphics improve the enjoyability... if it didn't them you wouldn't want graphics to improve.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







