By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zorg1000 said:
DonFerrari said:

The ones that doesn't think improving graphics improve your enjoyment would have stayed on their Atari and NES... you can say some doesn't care as much as others about graphics, but even so they praise the improvement on graphics their console of choice get.

Such a stupid argument, nobody is saying graphics shouldnt improve, were saying a game doesnt automatically become better with improved visuals.

If you take two versions of the same game and everything is identical except one version has moderately better visuals, it doesnt necessarily mean someone will enjoy it more.

Obviously we want graphics and hardware in general to improve over time since many gameplay elements can only be introduced with better tech.

If you want graphics to improve, then if everything else from both versions is the same then the graphics improve the enjoyability... if it didn't them you wouldn't want graphics to improve.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."