FJ-Warez said:
I Perdict said:
FJ-Warez said:
darthdevidem01 said:
They are PAYED & TRAINED to do this job hence they are more reliable & their opinions have a higher value than that of sieanr or NJ5 (both of whom are contantly negative about PS3)
|
Trained, man I really want a proof or that...
Still his job is about reviewing a game, but did they know how the game works??? did they participate on the development??? I take every review with a grain of salt, because is hard to make such assumtions when your participation limits you...
|
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's really funny.
You know why?
I'll tell you....
BECAUSE THEY DID!
Konami invited a crap load of people to some thing and just play MGS4 for a week and give feed back how to improve the game.
A few professional sites said the ones who participated in that event wont be the ones reviewing the game since their feed back my not have been implimented and the reviewer might have higher expectations because of so.
|
Err, when I say "participate in the development of a software" I am not talking about playing with it, I'm talking about the engine, the assets, the sound... working on the code, recording sound effects, making models...
|
lol at you. you said "did they participate on the development???" isn't giving suggestions to be impliment in the game part of development? Yes it is. Also since they had a part of development how do you know these people didn't interview with the developers while at the event and get some information on the specs of the game?
I'm sure a lot of game talk and communication happened for this event.
